At Human Resources conferences, it is not uncommon to hear a frantic call from professionals, in companies large and small, seeking help: “My CFO has just told me that I either show an ROI (Return on Investment) on our Human Capital initiative or it will be hard to justify the Human Resources budget!” It’s an agonizing plea coming from people who truly care about learning and development, but are afraid that it is going to be sacrificed on the altar of short-term profitability.
The question points to some deep conundrums. Can the human capital side of any business be measured in traditional dollar and cents terminology? What numbers are relevant to your human capital ROI? How many angels can dance on the head of a pin?
Measurement and human resources are like oil and water. The general stereotype is that HR professionals are not very numbers focused. Yet, they are arguably responsible for the largest capital asset of their organization. True, most other assets in the organization are tangible and can be valued by using a number of key indicators. Human capital, on the other hand, is “the collective sum of the attributes, life experiences, knowledge, inventiveness, energy and enthusiasm that its people choose to invest in their work.” (“Human capital- the elusive asset” by Leslie Weatherly, HR Magazine March 2003). Now go figure out how to plug those numbers into your abacus!
Traditionally, HR uses its numbers to focus on cost to hire ratio. While that might be a concrete statistic to quote in a report, if those hires do not produce quality employees who show long-term commitment, why should any CEO care? The real measure of a hire is three years out. But anyone pressed for ROI numbers probably can’t wait that long.
At the root of this ROI issue is a more basic problem. HR doesn’t get enough respect from line or executive managers. Consider: Who always gets blamed for bad hires? Who has to be the performance management police? Who has to fight for promotions that are a meaningful part of a succession planning strategy? The fact that these areas are in the HR domain and not a major business concern indicates that HR is not considered a contributor to business success.
If you want to prove ROI, I’m sure it can be done. I’m just not sure it will be meaningful. A whiz kid data cruncher I know told me that numbers can say anything you want. “Tell me what you want them to provide and I will show that they provide it.” His comment made me recall the saying that, “statistics are a group of numbers looking for an argument. Torture the data long enough and they will confess to anything.”
If ROI is the field in which you are fighting a budgetary war, the battle is already lost. To win the war for your organization, you need superior tactics. We in Human Resources make our roles more difficult then we have to. We simple don’t ask the correct questions. You must link every activity to the business strategy and the values of the organization. If you are adding value people know it because they invite you in to ask more questions and help them in the discovery of how to achieve success.
Some of the questions to ask are:
- What are the goals of the company?
- What needs to happen to meet the business objectives?
- What do people need to know to make this happen?
- What is the timeframe for it to happen?
- Who already has the skill and knowledge?
- If everyone learns what they ought to learn through your HR initiative what will the impact be on the business? If not learned, what will be the impact?
- What is your biggest people issue?
- What is the one thing that went so well last time you know it provided the foundation for success? Why?
Thinking in these terms makes HR more integral as a business partner because its efforts will be aligned with providing what the business needs. Line managers and executives have very simple concerns. By asking the right questions, at the beginning, of the right decision makers, HR can ensure that it develops activities (not necessarily training) that moves a group to achieve its business results. Accomplish that task, and I promise no one will ask you to waste time on statistics and longitudinal studies.
Let’s consider the work of one of our clients in the automotive logistics business. Recently the organization opened a new location and HR was involved in staffing and developing the work teams. To add value, they asked a number of important questions about the design of the processing line and came up with the following parameters:
- That the process design complies to the performance characteristics of the customer’s new car model – to ensure that there is a smooth flow of just in time products.
- That the computer system meet the standards of the client’s expectations and have significant IT infrastructure back up
- That the price they set for the client will actually cover the cost of production
Not surprisingly, the ROI issue never came up because the business leaders in that organization know that ROI is the by-product of proper planning and execution.
As I listen to HR people at conferences and read the piles of articles and books on establishing ROI measurements, I can only think that with the amount of energy that goes into establishing questionnaires and data collection, we could have moved the company forward with significant human resources initiatives. It makes me believe that executives are asking for proof of your worth only because your efforts have not borne real fruit and they are wondering what you are doing with the corporate cash. If there is no evidence that training is improving customer service, productivity, quality or safety it is too late to begin to prove it through a study. The decision to have your budget cut has already been made. If your CEO can see the connection between your programs and business success, they will know your value add and support your expenditures.
David Cohen is president of Strategic Action Group and the author of Inside the Box: Leading with Corporate Values to Drive Sustained Business Success and The Talent Edge: A Behavioral Approach to Hiring, Developing, and Keeping Top Performers.













Hi David
Great article. There’s a great UK comedian called Vic Reeves who once said, ‘88.2% of statistics are made up on the spot’. I think the whole ‘HR is dead if it doesn’t step up and take its rightful place as a serious business partner’ debate is going to be the main focus going forward. My employer, Dr Michael Reddy, recently raised the question of whether business could even do without HR. Citing the last PwC global trends report 2008 that showed that the number of HR Directors on the Board of FTSE 100 companies (we’re based in the UK!) shrank from 18 in the late 1990s down to 5 in 2008. Wouldn’t want to hazard a guess what the post financial crisis HR boardroom situation is now. I guess asking the right questions – at the right time – is vital. Focus is key. By the way, Michael was only suggesting HR cashes its chips because in that way the CEO and the Board would finally have to take an active interest in dealing with what they all claim is their biggest asset, instead of shucking it off to HR. Would you consider carrying this debate on over here? Our human capital forum HubCap Digital (www.hubcapdigital.com) would welcome the input as well as being introduced to your site (though after coming across it just now, I’ll be sure to pass it on).